Scholars & Explanation behind Persistent Inequalities
Discipline: Other
Type of Paper: Critical thinking
Academic Level: Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)
Paper Format: Other
Question
Instructionsf the following course readings/key concepts and use it to answer questions 1-3 in the next section:
Birdsall’s three instrumental reasons why inequality matters and how this differs from ‘textbook’ economic assumption about inequality
Piketty’s concept of r>g, 4 epochs, argument against inequality, and how a wealth tax can help reverse the modern system of inequality in the US
Bermeo's six forms of democratic backsliding and argument that we now see more 'vexing ambiguity' whereby "we now face forms of democratic backsliding that are legitimated through the very institutions that democracy promoters have prioritized"
Questions
1. In your own words, explain the author(s) central argument and key concepts mentioned above (200-300 words)
2. Critically analyze the central argument by explaining whether you agree or disagree with it. There is no right or wrong answer to this, but you must explain why you agree/disagree and support your perspective with evidence from the reading, lecture, or your own examples (200-300 words)
3. Pick at least 1 country (any country!). Find at least 2 pieces of data that are relevant to the country(s) of your choice and the reading/author(s) you discussed in the questions above. Apply the data to the topic you chose and explain why you find the data points particularly interesting or prescient. You are free to use any credible source or type of data. The following is a list of excellent sources to help get you started (100-200 words):
